pith. sign in

The Alternating Compositions of Weighted Differential Operators Yield The Weights' Wronskian With Which Constant?

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The alternated composition of $N=2p$ differential operators $ w_j(x)\,\partial_x^p$ of strict order $p$ on the line $\mathbb{R}\ni x$ is again a differential operator of strict order $p$; its coefficient is the constant $\mathrm{const}(p)$, depending only on the arity $N$, times the Wronskian determinant of the originally taken coefficients $w_1$, $\ldots$, $w_N$. The case $p=1$ of the Lie bracket for two vector fields fixes $\mathrm{const}(1)=1$. When $p=2$, finding $\mathrm{const}(2)=2$ is easy; we obtain $\mathrm{const}(3)=90$. The problem is to know $\mathrm{const}(p\geqslant 4)$. We express the formula of $\mathrm{const}(p)$ in terms of the sum with signs over the much smaller set of 'late-growing' permutations, thus reaching the exact values $c(p=4)= 586\,656$, $c(p=5)\approx 1.9\cdot 10^{12}$, and $c(p=6)\approx 7.9\cdot 10^{21}$; the positive integer sequence $\mathrm{const}(p)$ seems to be new.

fields

math.RA 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

clear filters

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.