Pith. sign in

What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The issue of demographic disparities in face recognition accuracy has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Various face image datasets have been proposed as 'fair' or 'balanced' to assess the accuracy of face recognition algorithms across demographics. These datasets typically balance the number of identities and images across demographics. It is important to note that the number of identities and images in an evaluation dataset are {\em not} driving factors for 1-to-1 face matching accuracy. Moreover, balancing the number of identities and images does not ensure balance in other factors known to impact accuracy, such as head pose, brightness, and image quality. We demonstrate these issues using several recently proposed datasets. To improve the ability to perform less biased evaluations, we propose a bias-aware toolkit that facilitates creation of cross-demographic evaluation datasets balanced on factors mentioned in this paper.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CV 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition cs.CV · 2025-02-04 · conditional · none · ref 32 · internal anchor

    A structured review of demographic fairness in face recognition covering causes, datasets, assessment metrics, and mitigation methods.