A structured review of demographic fairness in face recognition covering causes, datasets, assessment metrics, and mitigation methods.
What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The issue of demographic disparities in face recognition accuracy has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Various face image datasets have been proposed as 'fair' or 'balanced' to assess the accuracy of face recognition algorithms across demographics. These datasets typically balance the number of identities and images across demographics. It is important to note that the number of identities and images in an evaluation dataset are {\em not} driving factors for 1-to-1 face matching accuracy. Moreover, balancing the number of identities and images does not ensure balance in other factors known to impact accuracy, such as head pose, brightness, and image quality. We demonstrate these issues using several recently proposed datasets. To improve the ability to perform less biased evaluations, we propose a bias-aware toolkit that facilitates creation of cross-demographic evaluation datasets balanced on factors mentioned in this paper.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition
A structured review of demographic fairness in face recognition covering causes, datasets, assessment metrics, and mitigation methods.