Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.09818 v2 pith:VFG4ZZZP submitted 2023-04-17 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords faceaccuracybalanceddatasetsfactorsidentitiesimagesnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The issue of demographic disparities in face recognition accuracy has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Various face image datasets have been proposed as 'fair' or 'balanced' to assess the accuracy of face recognition algorithms across demographics. These datasets typically balance the number of identities and images across demographics. It is important to note that the number of identities and images in an evaluation dataset are {\em not} driving factors for 1-to-1 face matching accuracy. Moreover, balancing the number of identities and images does not ensure balance in other factors known to impact accuracy, such as head pose, brightness, and image quality. We demonstrate these issues using several recently proposed datasets. To improve the ability to perform less biased evaluations, we propose a bias-aware toolkit that facilitates creation of cross-demographic evaluation datasets balanced on factors mentioned in this paper.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lights, Camera, Matching: The Role of Image Illumination in Fair Face Recognition

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Balancing the brightness of face images within a pair reduces the Caucasian vs African American female gap in face recognition similarity scores by up to 57.6%.

  2. Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured review of demographic fairness in face recognition covering causes, datasets, assessment metrics, and mitigation methods.

Pith tools