REVIEW 2 cited by
What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The issue of demographic disparities in face recognition accuracy has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Various face image datasets have been proposed as 'fair' or 'balanced' to assess the accuracy of face recognition algorithms across demographics. These datasets typically balance the number of identities and images across demographics. It is important to note that the number of identities and images in an evaluation dataset are {\em not} driving factors for 1-to-1 face matching accuracy. Moreover, balancing the number of identities and images does not ensure balance in other factors known to impact accuracy, such as head pose, brightness, and image quality. We demonstrate these issues using several recently proposed datasets. To improve the ability to perform less biased evaluations, we propose a bias-aware toolkit that facilitates creation of cross-demographic evaluation datasets balanced on factors mentioned in this paper.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Lights, Camera, Matching: The Role of Image Illumination in Fair Face Recognition
Balancing the brightness of face images within a pair reduces the Caucasian vs African American female gap in face recognition similarity scores by up to 57.6%.
-
Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognition
A structured review of demographic fairness in face recognition covering causes, datasets, assessment metrics, and mitigation methods.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.