Concept activation vectors can be computed as the normalized difference between concept-mean and global-mean activations, giving a 46.4x average speedup over SVM-based CAVs with comparable quality.
Linear Explanations for Individual Neurons
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In recent years many methods have been developed to understand the internal workings of neural networks, often by describing the function of individual neurons in the model. However, these methods typically only focus on explaining the very highest activations of a neuron. In this paper we show this is not sufficient, and that the highest activation range is only responsible for a very small percentage of the neuron's causal effect. In addition, inputs causing lower activations are often very different and can't be reliably predicted by only looking at high activations. We propose that neurons should instead be understood as a linear combination of concepts, and develop an efficient method for producing these linear explanations. In addition, we show how to automatically evaluate description quality using simulation, i.e. predicting neuron activations on unseen inputs in vision setting.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
FastCAV: Efficient Computation of Concept Activation Vectors for Explaining Deep Neural Networks
Concept activation vectors can be computed as the normalized difference between concept-mean and global-mean activations, giving a 46.4x average speedup over SVM-based CAVs with comparable quality.