Pith. sign in

Model comparison and calibration assessment: User guide for consistent scoring functions in machine learning and actuarial practice.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12780, 2022

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

representative citing papers

Beyond IID: How General Are Tabular Foundation Models, Really?

cs.LG · 2026-06-29 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Tabular foundation models excel on tiny- to medium-sized IID data but are outperformed by traditional tree-based and deep learning models on non-IID, large, and high-dimensional datasets, based on evaluations across 11 models and 142 datasets in the new BeyondArena benchmark.

Assessing model calibration with boosting trees

math.ST · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

Boosting trees test necessary conditions for calibration and auto-calibration of regression models, shown powerful on a large insurance dataset.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • Beyond IID: How General Are Tabular Foundation Models, Really? cs.LG · 2026-06-29 · unverdicted · none · ref 211

    Tabular foundation models excel on tiny- to medium-sized IID data but are outperformed by traditional tree-based and deep learning models on non-IID, large, and high-dimensional datasets, based on evaluations across 11 models and 142 datasets in the new BeyondArena benchmark.

  • Assessing model calibration with boosting trees math.ST · 2026-06-06 · unverdicted · none · ref 9

    Boosting trees test necessary conditions for calibration and auto-calibration of regression models, shown powerful on a large insurance dataset.