MultiLogBench shows that LLM performance on automated logging varies substantially across programming languages, demonstrating that single-language evidence is insufficient for general claims about model behavior or tool design.
InProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering
6 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
6
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
baseline 2
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 6representative citing papers
A large-scale study of real-world repositories finds that AI-generated code differs from human-written code in complexity, structural traits, defect indicators, and commit-level activity patterns.
Empirical analysis of 4707 MoltBook posts shows AI-only technical discourse focuses on security, trust, and abstract topics while lacking concrete runtime and project details found in human GitHub discussions.
A survey of 419 practitioners shows strong reliance on reusable GitHub Actions for core CI/CD tasks but limited adoption of reusable workflows, with copy-pasting remaining common due to versioning and trust issues.
AdaDec improves Pass@1 accuracy of LLM code generation by up to 20.9% over greedy decoding by triggering lookahead reranking only at high-uncertainty steps on HumanEval+, MBPP+, and DevEval.
Systematic review of 145 papers on LLM-based log analysis, providing a unified taxonomy, common design patterns, evaluation practices, and challenges for deployment under drift and limited labels.
citing papers explorer
-
Single-Language Evidence Is Insufficient for Automated Logging: A Multilingual Benchmark and Empirical Study with LLMs
MultiLogBench shows that LLM performance on automated logging varies substantially across programming languages, demonstrating that single-language evidence is insufficient for general claims about model behavior or tool design.
-
A Large-Scale Empirical Study of AI-Generated Code in Real-World Repositories
A large-scale study of real-world repositories finds that AI-generated code differs from human-written code in complexity, structural traits, defect indicators, and commit-level activity patterns.
-
What Software Engineering Looks Like to AI Agents? -- An Empirical Study of AI-Only Technical Discourse on MoltBook
Empirical analysis of 4707 MoltBook posts shows AI-only technical discourse focuses on security, trust, and abstract topics while lacking concrete runtime and project details found in human GitHub discussions.
-
Automation and Reuse Practices in GitHub Actions Workflows: A Practitioner's Perspective
A survey of 419 practitioners shows strong reliance on reusable GitHub Actions for core CI/CD tasks but limited adoption of reusable workflows, with copy-pasting remaining common due to versioning and trust issues.
-
AdaDec: A Uncertainty-Guided Lookahead Decoding Framework for LLM-Based Code Generation
AdaDec improves Pass@1 accuracy of LLM code generation by up to 20.9% over greedy decoding by triggering lookahead reranking only at high-uncertainty steps on HumanEval+, MBPP+, and DevEval.
-
LLM4Log: A Systematic Review of Large Language Model-based Log Analysis
Systematic review of 145 papers on LLM-based log analysis, providing a unified taxonomy, common design patterns, evaluation practices, and challenges for deployment under drift and limited labels.