EA-HAS-Bench's SMI-based per-epoch energy measurements correlate poorly with an external power meter (Pearson 0.64) due to under-sampling in 39% of epochs, and the paper proposes design principles and a calibration method for more reliable energy-aware benchmarking.
How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and review
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Machine learning and deep learning models have become essential in the recent fast development of artificial intelligence in many sectors of the society. It is now widely acknowledge that the development of these models has an environmental cost that has been analyzed in many studies. Several online and software tools have been developed to track energy consumption while training machine learning models. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive introduction and comparison of these tools for AI practitioners wishing to start estimating the environmental impact of their work. We review the specific vocabulary, the technical requirements for each tool. We compare the energy consumption estimated by each tool on two deep neural networks for image processing and on different types of servers. From these experiments, we provide some advice for better choosing the right tool and infrastructure.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Guidelines for the Quality Assessment of Energy-Aware NAS Benchmarks
EA-HAS-Bench's SMI-based per-epoch energy measurements correlate poorly with an external power meter (Pearson 0.64) due to under-sampling in 39% of epochs, and the paper proposes design principles and a calibration method for more reliable energy-aware benchmarking.