Pith. sign in

How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and review

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Machine learning and deep learning models have become essential in the recent fast development of artificial intelligence in many sectors of the society. It is now widely acknowledge that the development of these models has an environmental cost that has been analyzed in many studies. Several online and software tools have been developed to track energy consumption while training machine learning models. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive introduction and comparison of these tools for AI practitioners wishing to start estimating the environmental impact of their work. We review the specific vocabulary, the technical requirements for each tool. We compare the energy consumption estimated by each tool on two deep neural networks for image processing and on different types of servers. From these experiments, we provide some advice for better choosing the right tool and infrastructure.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Guidelines for the Quality Assessment of Energy-Aware NAS Benchmarks

cs.LG · 2025-05-21 · conditional · novelty 6.0

EA-HAS-Bench's SMI-based per-epoch energy measurements correlate poorly with an external power meter (Pearson 0.64) due to under-sampling in 39% of epochs, and the paper proposes design principles and a calibration method for more reliable energy-aware benchmarking.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Guidelines for the Quality Assessment of Energy-Aware NAS Benchmarks cs.LG · 2025-05-21 · conditional · none · ref 49 · internal anchor

    EA-HAS-Bench's SMI-based per-epoch energy measurements correlate poorly with an external power meter (Pearson 0.64) due to under-sampling in 39% of epochs, and the paper proposes design principles and a calibration method for more reliable energy-aware benchmarking.