Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.08323 v2 pith:GAEGKGMS submitted 2023-06-14 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords learningmodelsdeeptoolbeenconsumptiondevelopmentenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning and deep learning models have become essential in the recent fast development of artificial intelligence in many sectors of the society. It is now widely acknowledge that the development of these models has an environmental cost that has been analyzed in many studies. Several online and software tools have been developed to track energy consumption while training machine learning models. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive introduction and comparison of these tools for AI practitioners wishing to start estimating the environmental impact of their work. We review the specific vocabulary, the technical requirements for each tool. We compare the energy consumption estimated by each tool on two deep neural networks for image processing and on different types of servers. From these experiments, we provide some advice for better choosing the right tool and infrastructure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Guidelines for the Quality Assessment of Energy-Aware NAS Benchmarks

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EA-HAS-Bench's SMI-based per-epoch energy measurements correlate poorly with an external power meter (Pearson 0.64) due to under-sampling in 39% of epochs, and the paper proposes design principles and a calibration me...

Pith tools