REVIEW 1 cited by
How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine learning and deep learning models have become essential in the recent fast development of artificial intelligence in many sectors of the society. It is now widely acknowledge that the development of these models has an environmental cost that has been analyzed in many studies. Several online and software tools have been developed to track energy consumption while training machine learning models. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive introduction and comparison of these tools for AI practitioners wishing to start estimating the environmental impact of their work. We review the specific vocabulary, the technical requirements for each tool. We compare the energy consumption estimated by each tool on two deep neural networks for image processing and on different types of servers. From these experiments, we provide some advice for better choosing the right tool and infrastructure.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Guidelines for the Quality Assessment of Energy-Aware NAS Benchmarks
EA-HAS-Bench's SMI-based per-epoch energy measurements correlate poorly with an external power meter (Pearson 0.64) due to under-sampling in 39% of epochs, and the paper proposes design principles and a calibration me...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.