AI safety requires stabilizing sovereignty boundaries to stop irreversible decision authority from concentrating in the most efficient AI nodes.
(2014).Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.AI 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Static value alignment approaches for AI are structurally insufficient for robust alignment because of Hume's is-ought gap, value pluralism, and the extended frame problem.
citing papers explorer
-
AI Safety as Control of Irreversibility: A Systems Framework for Decision-Energy and Sovereignty Boundaries
AI safety requires stabilizing sovereignty boundaries to stop irreversible decision authority from concentrating in the most efficient AI nodes.
-
The Specification Trap: Why Static Value Alignment Alone Is Insufficient for Robust Alignment
Static value alignment approaches for AI are structurally insufficient for robust alignment because of Hume's is-ought gap, value pluralism, and the extended frame problem.