Pith. sign in

Cweval: Outcome- driven evaluation on functionality and security of llm code generation

6 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

6 Pith papers citing it

fields

cs.CR 5 cs.CL 1

years

2026 4 2025 2

representative citing papers

Constrained Code Generation with Discrete Diffusion

cs.CL · 2026-05-16 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Constrained Diffusion for Code (CDC) integrates constraint satisfaction into the reverse denoising process of discrete diffusion models via constraint-aware operators that use optimization and program analysis to steer generation toward feasible programs.

AutoBaxBuilder: Bootstrapping Code Security Benchmarking

cs.CR · 2025-12-24 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

AutoBaxBuilder automates creation of code security benchmarks for LLMs via LLM-driven test and exploit generation with reliability checks, yielding AutoBaxBench and cutting human effort by a factor of 12.

SoK: AI Secure Code Generation: Progress, Pitfalls, and Paths Forward

cs.CR · 2026-06-23 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

The paper introduces a three-level framework for AI secure code generation, finds that principle understanding statistically predicts code outcomes, but identifies persistent knowledge-actuation gaps across models and agents.

False Security Confidence in Benign LLM Code Generation

cs.CR · 2026-04-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

False Security Confidence (FSC) rate is defined as the prevalence of security failures inside the set of functionally correct LLM code outputs, with a three-ecosystem task view and FSC-hard category proposed for future measurement.

citing papers explorer

Showing 6 of 6 citing papers.

  • Constrained Code Generation with Discrete Diffusion cs.CL · 2026-05-16 · unverdicted · none · ref 29

    Constrained Diffusion for Code (CDC) integrates constraint satisfaction into the reverse denoising process of discrete diffusion models via constraint-aware operators that use optimization and program analysis to steer generation toward feasible programs.

  • AutoBaxBuilder: Bootstrapping Code Security Benchmarking cs.CR · 2025-12-24 · unverdicted · none · ref 3

    AutoBaxBuilder automates creation of code security benchmarks for LLMs via LLM-driven test and exploit generation with reliability checks, yielding AutoBaxBench and cutting human effort by a factor of 12.

  • SoK: AI Secure Code Generation: Progress, Pitfalls, and Paths Forward cs.CR · 2026-06-23 · unverdicted · none · ref 26

    The paper introduces a three-level framework for AI secure code generation, finds that principle understanding statistically predicts code outcomes, but identifies persistent knowledge-actuation gaps across models and agents.

  • CyberGym-E2E: Scalable Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents' End-to-End Cybersecurity Capabilities cs.CR · 2026-06-03 · conditional · none · ref 13

    CyberGym-E2E turns 920 real OSS-Fuzz vulnerabilities into end-to-end agent tasks; results show frontier agents patch known bugs well (65.9% S3) but find the exact ground-truth vulnerability less often (22.2% S4).

  • False Security Confidence in Benign LLM Code Generation cs.CR · 2026-04-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 4

    False Security Confidence (FSC) rate is defined as the prevalence of security failures inside the set of functionally correct LLM code outputs, with a three-ecosystem task view and FSC-hard category proposed for future measurement.

  • XOXO: Stealthy Cross-Origin Context Poisoning Attacks against AI Coding Assistants cs.CR · 2025-03-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 49

    XOXO is a cross-origin context poisoning attack on AI coding assistants that uses a Cayley Graph search algorithm (GCGS) to find stealthy perturbations, achieving 75.72% average success rate across five tasks and eleven models.