LLMs predict outcomes of real scientific experiments at 14-26% accuracy, comparable to human experts, but lack calibration on prediction reliability while humans demonstrate strong calibration.
Use the provided ‘experimental_setup‘ and ‘measurements_taken‘ to inform your understanding
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
SciPredict: Can LLMs Predict the Outcomes of Scientific Experiments in Natural Sciences?
LLMs predict outcomes of real scientific experiments at 14-26% accuracy, comparable to human experts, but lack calibration on prediction reliability while humans demonstrate strong calibration.