Pith. sign in

On fractal patterns in Ulam words

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Ulam words are binary words defined recursively as follows: the length-$1$ Ulam words are $0$ and $1$, and a binary word of length $n$ is Ulam if and only if it is expressible uniquely as a concatenation of two shorter, distinct Ulam words. We discover, fully describe, and prove a surprisingly rich structure already in the set of Ulam words containing exactly two $1$'s. In particular, this leads to a complete description of such words and a logarithmic-time algorithm to determine whether a binary word with two $1$'s is Ulam. Along the way, we uncover delicate parity and biperiodicity properties, as well as sharp bounds on the number of $0$'s outside the two $1$'s. We also show that sets of Ulam words indexed by the number $y$ of $0$'s between the two $1$'s have intricate tensor-based hierarchical structures determined by the arithmetic properties of $y$. This allows us to construct an infinite family of self-similar Ulam-word-based fractals indexed by the set of $2$-adic integers, containing the outward Sierpinski gasket as a special case.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

math.CO 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Small gaps in the Ulam sequence

math.CO · 2025-01-27 · conditional · novelty 6.0

For the Ulam sequence, this paper proves a_n <= 1.454^n for large n and proves that min_{1<=k<=n} a_{k+1}/a_k <= 1 + 7 log n / n for large n.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Small gaps in the Ulam sequence math.CO · 2025-01-27 · conditional · none · ref 15 · internal anchor

    For the Ulam sequence, this paper proves a_n <= 1.454^n for large n and proves that min_{1<=k<=n} a_{k+1}/a_k <= 1 + 7 log n / n for large n.