Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On fractal patterns in Ulam words

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.14229 v2 pith:2FQ7JCTF submitted 2022-11-23 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords ulamwordsbinarycontainingindexednumberpropertiesword
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Ulam words are binary words defined recursively as follows: the length-$1$ Ulam words are $0$ and $1$, and a binary word of length $n$ is Ulam if and only if it is expressible uniquely as a concatenation of two shorter, distinct Ulam words. We discover, fully describe, and prove a surprisingly rich structure already in the set of Ulam words containing exactly two $1$'s. In particular, this leads to a complete description of such words and a logarithmic-time algorithm to determine whether a binary word with two $1$'s is Ulam. Along the way, we uncover delicate parity and biperiodicity properties, as well as sharp bounds on the number of $0$'s outside the two $1$'s. We also show that sets of Ulam words indexed by the number $y$ of $0$'s between the two $1$'s have intricate tensor-based hierarchical structures determined by the arithmetic properties of $y$. This allows us to construct an infinite family of self-similar Ulam-word-based fractals indexed by the set of $2$-adic integers, containing the outward Sierpinski gasket as a special case.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Small gaps in the Ulam sequence

    math.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For the Ulam sequence, this paper proves a_n <= 1.454^n for large n and proves that min_{1<=k<=n} a_{k+1}/a_k <= 1 + 7 log n / n for large n.

Pith tools