The paper argues that less discriminatory algorithms cannot be defined by quantitative performance metrics alone and must incorporate a reasonableness standard, with feasible but computationally hard search problems.
Understanding trade-offs in classifier bias with quality-diversity optimization: an application to talent management
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Fairness,the impartial treatment towards individuals or groups regardless of their inherent or acquired characteristics [20], is a critical challenge for the successful implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in multiple fields like finances, human capital, and housing. A major struggle for the development of fair AI models lies in the bias implicit in the data available to train such models. Filtering or sampling the dataset before training can help ameliorate model bias but can also reduce model performance and the bias impact can be opaque. In this paper, we propose a method for visualizing the biases inherent in a dataset and understanding the potential trade-offs between fairness and accuracy. Our method builds on quality-diversity optimization, in particular Covariance Matrix Adaptation Multi-dimensional Archive of Phenotypic Elites (MAP-Elites). Our method provides a visual representation of bias in models, allows users to identify models within a minimal threshold of fairness, and determines the trade-off between fairness and accuracy.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
What Constitutes a Less Discriminatory Algorithm?
The paper argues that less discriminatory algorithms cannot be defined by quantitative performance metrics alone and must incorporate a reasonableness standard, with feasible but computationally hard search problems.