Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding trade-offs in classifier bias with quality-diversity optimization: an application to talent management

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.16965 v2 pith:ZPIYD5YF submitted 2024-11-25 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords biasfairnessmodelsmethodaccuracydatasetinherentmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fairness,the impartial treatment towards individuals or groups regardless of their inherent or acquired characteristics [20], is a critical challenge for the successful implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in multiple fields like finances, human capital, and housing. A major struggle for the development of fair AI models lies in the bias implicit in the data available to train such models. Filtering or sampling the dataset before training can help ameliorate model bias but can also reduce model performance and the bias impact can be opaque. In this paper, we propose a method for visualizing the biases inherent in a dataset and understanding the potential trade-offs between fairness and accuracy. Our method builds on quality-diversity optimization, in particular Covariance Matrix Adaptation Multi-dimensional Archive of Phenotypic Elites (MAP-Elites). Our method provides a visual representation of bias in models, allows users to identify models within a minimal threshold of fairness, and determines the trade-off between fairness and accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What Constitutes a Less Discriminatory Algorithm?

    cs.CY 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper argues that less discriminatory algorithms cannot be defined by quantitative performance metrics alone and must incorporate a reasonableness standard, with feasible but computationally hard search problems.

Pith tools