pith. sign in

Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agents: Foundations, Emerging Challenges, and Opportunities

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) for large language models (LLMs) is a key building block for safety guardrails of daily LLM applications. Yet, even as LLM agents are increasingly deployed in highly complex tasks, most UQ research still centers on single-turn question-answering. We argue that UQ research must shift to realistic settings with interactive agents, and that a new principled framework for agent UQ is needed. This paper presents three pillars to build a solid ground for future agent UQ research: (1. Foundations) We present the first general formulation of agent UQ that subsumes broad classes of existing UQ setups; (2. Challenges) We identify four technical challenges specifically tied to agentic setups -- selection of uncertainty estimator, uncertainty of heterogeneous entities, modeling uncertainty dynamics in interactive systems, and lack of fine-grained benchmarks -- with numerical analysis on a real-world agent benchmark, $\tau^2$-bench; (3. Future Directions) We conclude with noting on the practical implications of agent UQ and remaining open problems as forward-looking discussion for future explorations.

fields

cs.AI 2

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

clear filters

representative citing papers

Agentic Abstention: Do Agents Know When to Stop Instead of Act?

cs.AI · 2026-06-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

LLM agents often fail to abstain at the right time in uncertain multi-turn tasks, and the CONVOLVE context engineering method raises timely abstention rates on WebShop from 26.7 to 57.4 without parameter updates.

Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents

cs.AI · 2026-06-17 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A prompt-based uncertainty decomposition separates action confidence from request uncertainty to enable clarification seeking in LLM agents, yielding F1 gains of 73% and 36% over baselines on two new underspecified benchmarks across five models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers after filters.

  • Agentic Abstention: Do Agents Know When to Stop Instead of Act? cs.AI · 2026-06-27 · unverdicted · none · ref 8 · internal anchor

    LLM agents often fail to abstain at the right time in uncertain multi-turn tasks, and the CONVOLVE context engineering method raises timely abstention rates on WebShop from 26.7 to 57.4 without parameter updates.

  • Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents cs.AI · 2026-06-17 · unverdicted · none · ref 16 · internal anchor

    A prompt-based uncertainty decomposition separates action confidence from request uncertainty to enable clarification seeking in LLM agents, yielding F1 gains of 73% and 36% over baselines on two new underspecified benchmarks across five models.