Deep-layer embeddings of short literary excerpts carry enough information to identify their source book and author, with same-author works more confused, indicating style is encoded in the prompt representation.
Latent Space Interpretation for Stylistic Analysis and Explainable Authorship Attribution
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Recent state-of-the-art authorship attribution methods learn authorship representations of texts in a latent, non-interpretable space, hindering their usability in real-world applications. Our work proposes a novel approach to interpreting these learned embeddings by identifying representative points in the latent space and utilizing LLMs to generate informative natural language descriptions of the writing style of each point. We evaluate the alignment of our interpretable space with the latent one and find that it achieves the best prediction agreement compared to other baselines. Additionally, we conduct a human evaluation to assess the quality of these style descriptions, validating their utility as explanations for the latent space. Finally, we investigate whether human performance on the challenging AA task improves when aided by our system's explanations, finding an average improvement of around +20% in accuracy.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
What's in a prompt? Language models encode literary style in prompt embeddings
Deep-layer embeddings of short literary excerpts carry enough information to identify their source book and author, with same-author works more confused, indicating style is encoded in the prompt representation.