Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Latent Space Interpretation for Stylistic Analysis and Explainable Authorship Attribution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.07072 v1 pith:ZPUBPE3T submitted 2024-09-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords latentspaceauthorshipattributiondescriptionsexplanationshumanstyle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent state-of-the-art authorship attribution methods learn authorship representations of texts in a latent, non-interpretable space, hindering their usability in real-world applications. Our work proposes a novel approach to interpreting these learned embeddings by identifying representative points in the latent space and utilizing LLMs to generate informative natural language descriptions of the writing style of each point. We evaluate the alignment of our interpretable space with the latent one and find that it achieves the best prediction agreement compared to other baselines. Additionally, we conduct a human evaluation to assess the quality of these style descriptions, validating their utility as explanations for the latent space. Finally, we investigate whether human performance on the challenging AA task improves when aided by our system's explanations, finding an average improvement of around +20% in accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What's in a prompt? Language models encode literary style in prompt embeddings

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Deep-layer embeddings of short literary excerpts carry enough information to identify their source book and author, with same-author works more confused, indicating style is encoded in the prompt representation.

Pith tools