Post-ADC inference supplies valid p-values and confidence intervals for data-dependent targets after active data collection by extending selective inference to correct for both adaptive sampling bias and post-hoc target selection, relying only on noise assumptions.
Selective randomization inference for adaptive experiments
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Adaptive experiments use preliminary analyses of the data to inform further course of action and are commonly used in many disciplines including medical and social sciences. Because the null hypothesis and experimental design are data-dependent, it has long been recognized that statistical inference for adaptive experiments is not straightforward. Most existing methods only apply to specific adaptive designs and rely on strong assumptions. In this work, we propose selective randomization inference as a general framework for analysing adaptive experiments. In a nutshell, our approach applies conditional post-selection inference to randomization tests. By using directed acyclic graphs to describe the data generating process, we derive a selective randomization p-value that controls the selective type-I error. As inference only relies on the randomness in the treatment assignment, no modelling assumptions or independent and identically distributed data are needed. We elaborate on conditions that render the proposed p-value computable and provide rejection sampling and MCMC algorithms to find a Monte Carlo approximation. Moreover, this article shows how to estimate and construct confidence intervals for a homogeneous treatment effect. Lastly, we demonstrate our method and compare it with other randomization tests using synthetic and real-world data.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Tutorial on a statistical roadmap and R packages for selective borrowing in hybrid controlled trials, demonstrated on synthetic lung cancer data.
citing papers explorer
-
Post-ADC Inference: Valid Inference After Active Data Collection
Post-ADC inference supplies valid p-values and confidence intervals for data-dependent targets after active data collection by extending selective inference to correct for both adaptive sampling bias and post-hoc target selection, relying only on noise assumptions.
-
Robust Estimation and Inference with Selective Borrowing in Hybrid Controlled Trials: A Tutorial with SelectiveIntegrative and intFRT
Tutorial on a statistical roadmap and R packages for selective borrowing in hybrid controlled trials, demonstrated on synthetic lung cancer data.