Pith. sign in

Busterx: Mllm-powered ai-generated video forgery detection and explanation

7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

7 Pith papers citing it
abstract

As generative video models become increasingly realistic, detecting AI-generated videos requires systems that offer both accuracy and interpretability. However, applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to video forensics is currently limited by outdated datasets, simplistic evaluation protocols, and a reliance on black-box classification. To address these issues, we introduce a comprehensive dataset, benchmark, and baseline model for video forgery detection. First, we present \textbf{GenBuster-200K}, a fair dataset of over 200,000 high-quality videos sourced from state-of-the-art generators, featuring diverse real-world scenarios. Second, we propose \textbf{GenBuster-Bench}, a diagnostic benchmark spanning three progressive tracks (In-Domain, Out-of-Domain, and In-the-Wild) to evaluate models across \textit{domain shifts} and \textit{generational shifts}. It also introduces an MLLM-as-a-Judge protocol to assess the quality of the generated forensic explanations. Finally, we develop \textbf{BusterX}, an MLLM baseline with RL training. Instead of direct binary classification, BusterX formulates detection as a visual reasoning task, where the generated reasoning chain serves as detector itself. Experimental results demonstrate that BusterX outperforms several leading MLLMs (e.g., Qwen3.5, Claude-Sonnet-4.6) in both detection accuracy and rationale quality.

citation-role summary

background 2 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CV 7

years

2026 6 2025 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 7

polarities

background 3

representative citing papers

Watch, Remember, Reason: Human-View Video Understanding with MLLMs

cs.CV · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

This is a survey that frames video MLLM research via a human-view formulation of perceptual representations, memory states, reasoning traces, and predictions, then reviews methods, datasets, benchmarks, and open problems.

citing papers explorer

Showing 7 of 7 citing papers.