Diverse, influence-function-scored exemplar summaries retrieved with a DPP improve legal summarization over no-exemplar and similarity-only baselines on SuperSCOTUS and CivilSum, with modest and statistically partial gains.
LexSumm and LexT5: Benchmarking and Modeling Legal Summarization Tasks in English
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In the evolving NLP landscape, benchmarks serve as yardsticks for gauging progress. However, existing Legal NLP benchmarks only focus on predictive tasks, overlooking generative tasks. This work curates LexSumm, a benchmark designed for evaluating legal summarization tasks in English. It comprises eight English legal summarization datasets, from diverse jurisdictions, such as the US, UK, EU and India. Additionally, we release LexT5, legal oriented sequence-to-sequence model, addressing the limitation of the existing BERT-style encoder-only models in the legal domain. We assess its capabilities through zero-shot probing on LegalLAMA and fine-tuning on LexSumm. Our analysis reveals abstraction and faithfulness errors even in summaries generated by zero-shot LLMs, indicating opportunities for further improvements. LexSumm benchmark and LexT5 model are available at https://github.com/TUMLegalTech/LexSumm-LexT5.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
RELexED: Retrieval-Enhanced Legal Summarization with Exemplar Diversity
Diverse, influence-function-scored exemplar summaries retrieved with a DPP improve legal summarization over no-exemplar and similarity-only baselines on SuperSCOTUS and CivilSum, with modest and statistically partial gains.