REVIEW 3 cited by
LexSumm and LexT5: Benchmarking and Modeling Legal Summarization Tasks in English
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In the evolving NLP landscape, benchmarks serve as yardsticks for gauging progress. However, existing Legal NLP benchmarks only focus on predictive tasks, overlooking generative tasks. This work curates LexSumm, a benchmark designed for evaluating legal summarization tasks in English. It comprises eight English legal summarization datasets, from diverse jurisdictions, such as the US, UK, EU and India. Additionally, we release LexT5, legal oriented sequence-to-sequence model, addressing the limitation of the existing BERT-style encoder-only models in the legal domain. We assess its capabilities through zero-shot probing on LegalLAMA and fine-tuning on LexSumm. Our analysis reveals abstraction and faithfulness errors even in summaries generated by zero-shot LLMs, indicating opportunities for further improvements. LexSumm benchmark and LexT5 model are available at https://github.com/TUMLegalTech/LexSumm-LexT5.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
RELexED: Retrieval-Enhanced Legal Summarization with Exemplar Diversity
Diverse, influence-function-scored exemplar summaries retrieved with a DPP improve legal summarization over no-exemplar and similarity-only baselines on SuperSCOTUS and CivilSum, with modest and statistically partial gains.
-
CoPERLex: Content Planning with Event-based Representations for Legal Case Summarization
An event-based planning pipeline with content selection improves faithfulness and coherence in legal case summarization across four datasets.
-
Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science
A survey and taxonomy of LLM applications in political science, with a case study suggesting that larger LLMs reproduce ANES 2016 voting patterns more accurately than smaller ones.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.