Pith. sign in

How Predictable is Your State? Leveraging Lexical and Contextual Information for Predicting Legislative Floor Action at the State Level

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Modeling U.S. Congressional legislation and roll-call votes has received significant attention in previous literature. However, while legislators across 50 state governments and D.C. propose over 100,000 bills each year, and on average enact over 30% of them, state level analysis has received relatively less attention due in part to the difficulty in obtaining the necessary data. Since each state legislature is guided by their own procedures, politics and issues, however, it is difficult to qualitatively asses the factors that affect the likelihood of a legislative initiative succeeding. Herein, we present several methods for modeling the likelihood of a bill receiving floor action across all 50 states and D.C. We utilize the lexical content of over 1 million bills, along with contextual legislature and legislator derived features to build our predictive models, allowing a comparison of the factors that are important to the lawmaking process. Furthermore, we show that these signals hold complementary predictive power, together achieving an average improvement in accuracy of 18% over state specific baselines.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.SI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Framework of Voting Prediction of Parliament Members

cs.SI · 2025-05-18 · reject · novelty 4.0

A multi-country framework predicts individual parliamentary votes with up to 85% accuracy and bill outcomes with up to 84% accuracy, but the evaluation does not include trivial baselines.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Framework of Voting Prediction of Parliament Members cs.SI · 2025-05-18 · reject · none · ref 37 · internal anchor

    A multi-country framework predicts individual parliamentary votes with up to 85% accuracy and bill outcomes with up to 84% accuracy, but the evaluation does not include trivial baselines.