Evaluation of 6233 MedGPTs finds 25-30% with low factual accuracy, 33.6-54.3% violating operational thresholds, and 57% of action-enabled models lacking privacy disclosures.
Creating trustworthy llms: Dealing with hallucinations in healthcare ai
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Uncertainty-aware fine-tuning with a decision-theory-based loss produces better-calibrated uncertainty estimates than standard training on free-form QA tasks.
The paper introduces a taxonomy of AI safety for LLMs organized into Trustworthy AI, Responsible AI, and Safe AI perspectives, accompanied by a review of state-of-the-art methods, challenges, and future directions.
citing papers explorer
-
Do No Harm? Hallucination and Actor-Level Abuse in Web-Deployed Medical Large Language Models
Evaluation of 6233 MedGPTs finds 25-30% with low factual accuracy, 33.6-54.3% violating operational thresholds, and 57% of action-enabled models lacking privacy disclosures.
-
Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models via Uncertainty-Calibrated Fine-Tuning
Uncertainty-aware fine-tuning with a decision-theory-based loss produces better-calibrated uncertainty estimates than standard training on free-form QA tasks.
-
AI Safety Landscape for Large Language Models: Taxonomy, State-of-the-art, and Future Directions
The paper introduces a taxonomy of AI safety for LLMs organized into Trustworthy AI, Responsible AI, and Safe AI perspectives, accompanied by a review of state-of-the-art methods, challenges, and future directions.