pith. sign in

Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Data

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Machine learning models are often susceptible to adversarial perturbations of their inputs. Even small perturbations can cause state-of-the-art classifiers with high "standard" accuracy to produce an incorrect prediction with high confidence. To better understand this phenomenon, we study adversarially robust learning from the viewpoint of generalization. We show that already in a simple natural data model, the sample complexity of robust learning can be significantly larger than that of "standard" learning. This gap is information theoretic and holds irrespective of the training algorithm or the model family. We complement our theoretical results with experiments on popular image classification datasets and show that a similar gap exists here as well. We postulate that the difficulty of training robust classifiers stems, at least partially, from this inherently larger sample complexity.

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement

cs.LG · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Introduces a margin-adaptive confidence ranking method that learns an estimator from simulated diversity and derives margin-dependent generalization bounds for use in fixed-sequence testing of LLM-human agreement.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement cs.LG · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · none · ref 52 · internal anchor

    Introduces a margin-adaptive confidence ranking method that learns an estimator from simulated diversity and derives margin-dependent generalization bounds for use in fixed-sequence testing of LLM-human agreement.