Routed tile codes on a 2D nearest-neighbor grid achieve circuit-level thresholds of 0.11%-0.13% under SI1000 noise and become more qubit-efficient than the surface code below a physical error rate of 0.08%.
Vine Codes: Low-Overhead Quantum LDPC Codes on a Planar Square Grid
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The surface code is a promising route towards large-scale quantum computing, requiring only nearest-neighbour gates amenable to superconducting hardware. However, surface codes incur large qubit overheads. Novel quantum low-density parity check (qLDPC) codes promise to reduce overheads but require long-range connections that are difficult to achieve on superconducting platforms. Here, we introduce "Vine Codes" - qLDPC codes that are implementable on a planar square grid through nearest-neighbour, two-qubit gates native to superconducting platforms (iSWAP and CZ). Our approach generalises "Directional Codes" recently introduced by Geh\'er et. al. (2025) which are constrained to a torus. In contrast, vine codes have open boundary conditions constructed with the aid of routing qubits. We perform extensive numeric searches and find promising candidate vine codes, e.g. [[121,4,6]], [[221,6,7]], and [[234,9,6]] codes. We verify the circuit distances and show that data and measure qubits required can be reduced by up to ~28% relative to the surface code at a circuit distance of 7. Even including routing qubits, vine codes require fewer total qubits than the surface code (e.g. ~18% reduction at circuit distance 10) and benefits are expected to increase at higher distances. We perform circuit-level noise simulations to demonstrate that under a realistic noise model and at a near-term noise rate of $10^{-3}$, vine codes can perform better than the surface code while using fewer qubits. We give an exhaustive list of all unique vine codes up to stabiliser-weight 9. We additionally introduce "Flip-Vine Codes" which possess single-qubit transversal Clifford gates useful for fault-tolerant logic and magic state cultivation. We furthermore construct examples of generalised open boundaries for vine codes that go beyond the familiar X/Z boundaries of the surface and tile codes.
fields
quant-ph 2years
2026 2representative citing papers
Bunny codes are qLDPC codes found via exhaustive search that achieve ~3x higher code rate than toric codes (periodic) and ~2x over rotated surface codes (open) when using CNOT+CXSWAP on nearest-neighbor connectivity, with some showing 10x lower logical error rates in simulation.
citing papers explorer
-
Strictly Local Tile-Code Architectures on Two-Dimensional Planar Lattices
Routed tile codes on a 2D nearest-neighbor grid achieve circuit-level thresholds of 0.11%-0.13% under SI1000 noise and become more qubit-efficient than the surface code below a physical error rate of 0.08%.
-
Bunny Codes: Broadening Superconducting Quantum Error Correction Capability through Advanced Control Engineering
Bunny codes are qLDPC codes found via exhaustive search that achieve ~3x higher code rate than toric codes (periodic) and ~2x over rotated surface codes (open) when using CNOT+CXSWAP on nearest-neighbor connectivity, with some showing 10x lower logical error rates in simulation.