A systematic review of 82 healthcare XAI user studies produces an updated property framework and context-sensitive guidelines for evaluation design.
Roadmap of Designing Cognitive Metrics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 4 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
More recently, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research has shifted to focus on a more pragmatic or naturalistic account of understanding, that is, whether the stakeholders understand the explanation. This point is especially important for research on evaluation methods for XAI systems. Thus, another direction where XAI research can benefit significantly from cognitive science and psychology research is ways to measure understanding of users, responses and attitudes. These measures can be used to quantify explanation quality and as feedback to the XAI system to improve the explanations. The current report aims to propose suitable metrics for evaluating XAI systems from the perspective of the cognitive states and processes of stakeholders. We elaborate on 7 dimensions, i.e., goodness, satisfaction, user understanding, curiosity & engagement, trust & reliance, controllability & interactivity, and learning curve & productivity, together with the recommended subjective and objective psychological measures. We then provide more details about how we can use the recommended measures to evaluate a visual classification XAI system according to the recommended cognitive metrics.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Systematic Review of User-Centred Evaluation of Explainable AI in Healthcare
A systematic review of 82 healthcare XAI user studies produces an updated property framework and context-sensitive guidelines for evaluation design.