Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Roadmap of Designing Cognitive Metrics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.01737 v1 pith:VCIAH2RD submitted 2021-07-20 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords cognitiveresearchmeasuresmetricsrecommendedunderstandingartificialexplainable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

More recently, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research has shifted to focus on a more pragmatic or naturalistic account of understanding, that is, whether the stakeholders understand the explanation. This point is especially important for research on evaluation methods for XAI systems. Thus, another direction where XAI research can benefit significantly from cognitive science and psychology research is ways to measure understanding of users, responses and attitudes. These measures can be used to quantify explanation quality and as feedback to the XAI system to improve the explanations. The current report aims to propose suitable metrics for evaluating XAI systems from the perspective of the cognitive states and processes of stakeholders. We elaborate on 7 dimensions, i.e., goodness, satisfaction, user understanding, curiosity & engagement, trust & reliance, controllability & interactivity, and learning curve & productivity, together with the recommended subjective and objective psychological measures. We then provide more details about how we can use the recommended measures to evaluate a visual classification XAI system according to the recommended cognitive metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. A Systematic Review of User-Centred Evaluation of Explainable AI in Healthcare

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 82 healthcare XAI user studies produces an updated property framework and context-sensitive guidelines for evaluation design.

Pith tools