Pith. sign in

Chart-HQA: A Benchmark for Hypothetical Question Answering in Charts

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have garnered significant attention for their strong visual-semantic understanding. Most existing chart benchmarks evaluate MLLMs' ability to parse information from charts to answer questions. However, they overlook the inherent output biases of MLLMs, where models rely on their parametric memory to answer questions rather than genuinely understanding the chart content. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel Chart Hypothetical Question Answering (HQA) task, which imposes assumptions on the same question to compel models to engage in counterfactual reasoning based on the chart content. Furthermore, we introduce HAI, a human-AI interactive data synthesis approach that leverages the efficient text-editing capabilities of LLMs alongside human expert knowledge to generate diverse and high-quality HQA data at a low cost. Using HAI, we construct Chart-HQA, a challenging benchmark synthesized from publicly available data sources. Evaluation results on 18 MLLMs of varying model sizes reveal that current models face significant generalization challenges and exhibit imbalanced reasoning performance on the HQA task.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CV 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

ChartM$^3$: Benchmarking Chart Editing with Multimodal Instructions

cs.CV · 2025-07-25 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A new benchmark, ChartM3, shows that multimodal large language models perform worse when editing charts from visual-box guidance than from textual descriptions, and that fine-tuning on 24,000 in-distribution samples substantially raises benchmark scores.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • ChartM$^3$: Benchmarking Chart Editing with Multimodal Instructions cs.CV · 2025-07-25 · conditional · none · ref 2 · internal anchor

    A new benchmark, ChartM3, shows that multimodal large language models perform worse when editing charts from visual-box guidance than from textual descriptions, and that fine-tuning on 24,000 in-distribution samples substantially raises benchmark scores.