REVIEW 2 cited by
Chart-HQA: A Benchmark for Hypothetical Question Answering in Charts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have garnered significant attention for their strong visual-semantic understanding. Most existing chart benchmarks evaluate MLLMs' ability to parse information from charts to answer questions. However, they overlook the inherent output biases of MLLMs, where models rely on their parametric memory to answer questions rather than genuinely understanding the chart content. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel Chart Hypothetical Question Answering (HQA) task, which imposes assumptions on the same question to compel models to engage in counterfactual reasoning based on the chart content. Furthermore, we introduce HAI, a human-AI interactive data synthesis approach that leverages the efficient text-editing capabilities of LLMs alongside human expert knowledge to generate diverse and high-quality HQA data at a low cost. Using HAI, we construct Chart-HQA, a challenging benchmark synthesized from publicly available data sources. Evaluation results on 18 MLLMs of varying model sizes reveal that current models face significant generalization challenges and exhibit imbalanced reasoning performance on the HQA task.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ChartM$^3$: Benchmarking Chart Editing with Multimodal Instructions
A new benchmark, ChartM3, shows that multimodal large language models perform worse when editing charts from visual-box guidance than from textual descriptions, and that fine-tuning on 24,000 in-distribution samples s...
-
Perception, Reason, Think, and Plan: A Survey on Large Multimodal Reasoning Models
A survey organizes multimodal reasoning research into a staged roadmap and proposes native large multimodal reasoning models that unify perception, generation, and agentic planning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.