Suman's attempted proof of zeta(5) irrationality fails because it mistakes the existence of integer solutions to a Diophantine equation for the rationality of zeta(5).
A note on the Irrationality of $\zeta(5)$ and Higher Odd Zeta Values
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this note, we prove the irrationality of $\zeta(5)$ and generalize the method to prove the irrationality of all higher odd zeta values. Our proof relies on the method of contradiction, existence of solution of a system of Linear Diophantine equation, and mathematical induction. For $n\geq 1$, we denote $d_n=\text{lcm}(1,2,...,n)$. In the first part of the article, we assume $\zeta(5)$ is rational, say $a/b$. We observe that for $n\geq b$, there exists a system of equations involving linear combination of $\zeta(5)$ that has a solution. Later using the existence of solution of the Linear Diophantine equation, we show that such a system of linear combination of $\zeta(5)$ has no solution, which is a contradiction. In the second part of the article, we generalise this method for all higher odd zeta values.
fields
math.GM 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Note on a Recent Attempt to Prove the Irrationality of $\zeta(5)$
Suman's attempted proof of zeta(5) irrationality fails because it mistakes the existence of integer solutions to a Diophantine equation for the rationality of zeta(5).