Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A note on the Irrationality of $\zeta(5)$ and Higher Odd Zeta Values

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.07121 v7 pith:VRP4K6MA submitted 2024-07-08 math.GM

classification math.GM
keywords zetalinearsolutionhigherirrationalitymethodsystemvalues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this note, we prove the irrationality of $\zeta(5)$ and generalize the method to prove the irrationality of all higher odd zeta values. Our proof relies on the method of contradiction, existence of solution of a system of Linear Diophantine equation, and mathematical induction. For $n\geq 1$, we denote $d_n=\text{lcm}(1,2,...,n)$. In the first part of the article, we assume $\zeta(5)$ is rational, say $a/b$. We observe that for $n\geq b$, there exists a system of equations involving linear combination of $\zeta(5)$ that has a solution. Later using the existence of solution of the Linear Diophantine equation, we show that such a system of linear combination of $\zeta(5)$ has no solution, which is a contradiction. In the second part of the article, we generalise this method for all higher odd zeta values.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Note on a Recent Attempt to Prove the Irrationality of $\zeta(5)$

    math.GM 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Suman's attempted proof of zeta(5) irrationality fails because it mistakes the existence of integer solutions to a Diophantine equation for the rationality of zeta(5).

Pith tools