PEFT methods (LoRA, Adapter) achieve lower membership-inference AUC than full fine-tuning, indicating reduced memorisation, but DP's protective effect is weaker for PEFT models.
Auditing Data Provenance in Text-Generation Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
To help enforce data-protection regulations such as GDPR and detect unauthorized uses of personal data, we develop a new \emph{model auditing} technique that helps users check if their data was used to train a machine learning model. We focus on auditing deep-learning models that generate natural-language text, including word prediction and dialog generation. These models are at the core of popular online services and are often trained on personal data such as users' messages, searches, chats, and comments. We design and evaluate a black-box auditing method that can detect, with very few queries to a model, if a particular user's texts were used to train it (among thousands of other users). We empirically show that our method can successfully audit well-generalized models that are not overfitted to the training data. We also analyze how text-generation models memorize word sequences and explain why this memorization makes them amenable to auditing.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Efficient and Private: Memorisation under differentially private parameter-efficient fine-tuning in language models
PEFT methods (LoRA, Adapter) achieve lower membership-inference AUC than full fine-tuning, indicating reduced memorisation, but DP's protective effect is weaker for PEFT models.