A multi-agent debate framework where two LLMs discuss cultural scenarios and a judge resolves disagreements improves both accuracy and cultural-group parity on NormAd-ETI, letting 7-9B models match a 27B model.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Multiple LLM Agents Debate for Equitable Cultural Alignment
A multi-agent debate framework where two LLMs discuss cultural scenarios and a judge resolves disagreements improves both accuracy and cultural-group parity on NormAd-ETI, letting 7-9B models match a 27B model.