Social dynamics in LLM collectives cause representative agents to make less accurate decisions as peer pressure increases through larger adversarial groups, more capable peers, longer arguments, and persuasive styles.
Debate only when necessary: Adaptive multiagent collaboration for efficient llm reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05047
6 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
6
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 6roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
SVR-MAD treats pre-debate signals as priors and debate results as evidence to build a sparser communication graph, cutting token use by up to 61% while preserving or raising accuracy over prior MAD methods.
HCP-MAD reduces token costs in multi-agent debates by using heterogeneous consensus verification, adaptive pair-agent stopping, and escalated collective voting based on task complexity signals.
Oracle per-example routing among decoding, voting, and debate yields +13-14 pp gains over the best fixed protocol, but vote-entropy thresholds and learned routers recover only 1-2 pp with non-significant results.
A comprehensive review of self-evolving AI agents that improve themselves over time, organized via a framework of inputs, agent system, environment, and optimizers, with domain-specific and safety discussions.
EMS reduces the average number of agents invoked for majority voting by 32% via reliability-aware prioritization and early stopping on six benchmarks.
citing papers explorer
-
Social Dynamics as Critical Vulnerabilities that Undermine Objective Decision-Making in LLM Collectives
Social dynamics in LLM collectives cause representative agents to make less accurate decisions as peer pressure increases through larger adversarial groups, more capable peers, longer arguments, and persuasive styles.
-
SVR-MAD: A Bayesian-Inspired Framework for Posterior-Guided Multi-Agent Debate
SVR-MAD treats pre-debate signals as priors and debate results as evidence to build a sparser communication graph, cutting token use by up to 61% while preserving or raising accuracy over prior MAD methods.
-
Heterogeneous Consensus-Progressive Reasoning for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate
HCP-MAD reduces token costs in multi-agent debates by using heterogeneous consensus verification, adaptive pair-agent stopping, and escalated collective voting based on task complexity signals.
-
Statistical Scouting Finds Debate-Safe but Not Debate-Useful Cases: A Matched-Ceiling Study of Open-Weight LLM Reasoning Protocols
Oracle per-example routing among decoding, voting, and debate yields +13-14 pp gains over the best fixed protocol, but vote-entropy thresholds and learned routers recover only 1-2 pp with non-significant results.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems
A comprehensive review of self-evolving AI agents that improve themselves over time, organized via a framework of inputs, agent system, environment, and optimizers, with domain-specific and safety discussions.
-
EMS: Multi-Agent Voting via Efficient Majority-then-Stopping
EMS reduces the average number of agents invoked for majority voting by 32% via reliability-aware prioritization and early stopping on six benchmarks.