Users show curiosity over concern toward LLM inferences of personal information, with acceptability depending on context, alignment with expectations, and who uses the inferences rather than just the content.
Large language models can infer personality from free-form user interactions,
6 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 6roles
background 4polarities
background 4representative citing papers
The paper introduces a new taxonomy that groups AI-driven psychological computing tasks by their underlying computational patterns into four categories and reviews over 300 works from the pre-trained model to LLM eras.
A gamified system with multiple LLM agents of varied personalities gathers interaction data to produce more effective and interpretable Big Five personality assessments than single-context methods.
A survey proposing a three-pillar framework to evaluate LLMs as tools for measuring latent psychological constructs and reviewing applications in personality and mental health.
ADAM uses personality-guided LLM augmentation and cross-lingual attention distillation to raise balanced accuracy on multilingual personality recognition to 0.6332 on Essays and 0.7448 on Kaggle, outperforming standard BCE loss.
Dark personality traits predict self-reported online incivility but show no reliable link to linguistic toxicity features extracted from users' actual Reddit activity.
citing papers explorer
-
When Are LLM Inferences Acceptable? User Reactions and Control Preferences for Inferred Personal Information
Users show curiosity over concern toward LLM inferences of personal information, with acceptability depending on context, alignment with expectations, and who uses the inferences rather than just the content.
-
Exploring a Gamified Personality Assessment Method through Interaction with LLM Agents Embodying Different Personalities
A gamified system with multiple LLM agents of varied personalities gathers interaction data to produce more effective and interpretable Big Five personality assessments than single-context methods.