The paper introduces the AI-Identity Risk Taxonomy (AIRT) with 37 risk categories and the Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) as a six-domain framework to close gaps in technical, regulatory, and cross-jurisdictional governance of AI machine identities.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 2representative citing papers
A systematic literature review of explainability in multimodal attention models finds most studies focus on vision-language tasks with attention-based explanations, but evaluation methods lack consistency and modality-specific considerations.
citing papers explorer
-
Who Governs the Machine? A Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) for AI Systems Operating Across Enterprise and Geopolitical Boundaries
The paper introduces the AI-Identity Risk Taxonomy (AIRT) with 37 risk categories and the Machine Identity Governance Taxonomy (MIGT) as a six-domain framework to close gaps in technical, regulatory, and cross-jurisdictional governance of AI machine identities.
-
Decoding the Multimodal Maze: A Systematic Review on the Adoption of Explainability in Multimodal Attention-based Models
A systematic literature review of explainability in multimodal attention models finds most studies focus on vision-language tasks with attention-based explanations, but evaluation methods lack consistency and modality-specific considerations.