A new 698-pair human-annotated benchmark and inconsistency typology for political language, with LLMs roughly matching individual annotators on coarse detection but not on fine-grained subtypes.
(a) If your work uses existing assets, did you cite the cre- ators? Yes, section 4
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Misleading through Inconsistency: A Benchmark for Political Inconsistencies Detection
A new 698-pair human-annotated benchmark and inconsistency typology for political language, with LLMs roughly matching individual annotators on coarse detection but not on fine-grained subtypes.