A randomized Nishio solver's strategy-cycle count correlates strongly with website difficulty labels for four of five Sudoku sites, enabling a three-tier universal difficulty classification.
Difficulty Rating of Sudoku Puzzles: An Overview and Evaluation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
How can we predict the difficulty of a Sudoku puzzle? We give an overview of difficulty rating metrics and evaluate them on extensive dataset on human problem solving (more then 1700 Sudoku puzzles, hundreds of solvers). The best results are obtained using a computational model of human solving activity. Using the model we show that there are two sources of the problem difficulty: complexity of individual steps (logic operations) and structure of dependency among steps. We also describe metrics based on analysis of solutions under relaxed constraints -- a novel approach inspired by phase transition phenomenon in the graph coloring problem. In our discussion we focus not just on the performance of individual metrics on the Sudoku puzzle, but also on their generalizability and applicability to other problems.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
baseline 1polarities
baseline 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Project Patti: Why can You Solve Diabolical Puzzles on one Sudoku Website but not Easy Puzzles on another Sudoku Website?
A randomized Nishio solver's strategy-cycle count correlates strongly with website difficulty labels for four of five Sudoku sites, enabling a three-tier universal difficulty classification.