Interviews with 16 qualitative researchers identify efficiency, ownership, and trust as key factors shaping preferences for AI as a supportive assistant rather than a full collaborator or supervisor in qualitative data analysis.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
The study introduces a framework and reports differences in consistency, cohesiveness, and correctness of themes produced under synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration across three interactive NLP tools.
citing papers explorer
-
Not a Collaborator or a Supervisor, but an Assistant: Striking the Balance Between Efficiency and Ownership in AI-incorporated Qualitative Data Analysis
Interviews with 16 qualitative researchers identify efficiency, ownership, and trust as key factors shaping preferences for AI as a supportive assistant rather than a full collaborator or supervisor in qualitative data analysis.
-
Effects of Collaboration on the Performance of Interactive Theme Discovery Systems
The study introduces a framework and reports differences in consistency, cohesiveness, and correctness of themes produced under synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration across three interactive NLP tools.