Pith. sign in

hub

Autonomous evaluation and refinement of digital agents

12 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 3 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

12 Pith papers citing it
3 external citations · Pith
abstract

We show that domain-general automatic evaluators can significantly improve the performance of agents for web navigation and device control. We experiment with multiple evaluation models that trade off between inference cost, modularity of design, and accuracy. We validate the performance of these models in several popular benchmarks for digital agents, finding between 74.4 and 92.9% agreement with oracle evaluation metrics. Finally, we use these evaluators to improve the performance of existing agents via fine-tuning and inference-time guidance. Without any additional supervision, we improve state-of-the-art performance by 29% on the popular benchmark WebArena, and achieve around 75% relative improvement in device control settings.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Benchmark Everything Everywhere All at Once

cs.AI · 2026-06-04 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Benchmark Agent is an autonomous agentic system that constructs benchmarks for LLMs and MLLMs via query analysis, subtask design, annotation and quality control, yielding 15 benchmarks with minimal human input.

Evaluating Multi-turn Human-AI Interaction

cs.HC · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Introduces the TCR framework to evaluate educational LLM assistants on transparency, consistency, and refinement in multi-turn interactions, complementing aggregate metrics.

Agent Workflow Memory

cs.CL · 2024-09-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

AWM induces reusable workflows from agent experiences and provides them selectively to improve success rates by 24.6% on Mind2Web and 51.1% on WebArena while reducing steps taken.

citing papers explorer

Showing 12 of 12 citing papers.