Pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalization

Canonical reference. 100% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

27 Pith papers citing it
85 external citations · Pith
Background 100% of classified citations
abstract

Recent work has shown that fine-tuning large pre-trained language models on a collection of tasks described via instructions, a.k.a. instruction-tuning, improves their zero and few-shot generalization to unseen tasks. However, there is a limited understanding of the performance trade-offs of different decisions made during the instruction-tuning process. These decisions include the scale and diversity of the instruction-tuning benchmark, different task sampling strategies, fine-tuning with and without demonstrations, training using specialized datasets for reasoning and dialogue, and finally, the fine-tuning objectives themselves. In this paper, we characterize the effect of instruction-tuning decisions on downstream task performance when scaling both model and benchmark sizes. To this end, we create OPT-IML Bench: a large benchmark for Instruction Meta-Learning (IML) of 2000 NLP tasks consolidated into task categories from 8 existing benchmarks, and prepare an evaluation framework to measure three types of model generalizations: to tasks from fully held-out categories, to held-out tasks from seen categories, and to held-out instances from seen tasks. Through the lens of this framework, we first present insights about instruction-tuning decisions as applied to OPT-30B and further exploit these insights to train OPT-IML 30B and 175B, which are instruction-tuned versions of OPT. OPT-IML demonstrates all three generalization abilities at both scales on four different evaluation benchmarks with diverse tasks and input formats -- PromptSource, FLAN, Super-NaturalInstructions, and UnifiedSKG. Not only does it significantly outperform OPT on all benchmarks but is also highly competitive with existing models fine-tuned on each specific benchmark. We release OPT-IML at both scales, together with the OPT-IML Bench evaluation framework.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 12 method 1

citation-polarity summary

polarities

background 13

representative citing papers

Self-Rewarding Language Models

cs.CL · 2024-01-18 · conditional · novelty 7.0

Iterative self-rewarding via LLM-as-Judge in DPO training on Llama 2 70B improves instruction following and self-evaluation, outperforming GPT-4 on AlpacaEval 2.0.

QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs

cs.LG · 2023-05-23 · conditional · novelty 7.0

QLoRA finetunes 4-bit quantized LLMs via LoRA adapters to match full-precision performance while using far less memory, enabling 65B-scale training on single GPUs and producing Guanaco models near ChatGPT level.

Visual Instruction Tuning

cs.CV · 2023-04-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

LLaVA is trained on GPT-4 generated visual instruction data to achieve 85.1% relative performance to GPT-4 on synthetic multimodal tasks and 92.53% accuracy on Science QA.

Online Data Selection Is Implicit Alignment

cs.LG · 2026-07-08 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Online SFT data selection acts as an implicit preference model, shifting refusal rates, verbosity, and sycophancy in directions predictable from the selected data's attribute mixture.

Identifying Bias in Machine-generated Text Detection

cs.CL · 2025-12-10 · accept · novelty 6.0

Machine-generated text detectors show demographic biases, flagging ELL essays and some disadvantaged groups more often as AI-written while humans show no such biases.

DeepSeek-OCR: Contexts Optical Compression

cs.CV · 2025-10-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DeepSeek-OCR compresses text contexts up to 20x via 2D optical mapping while achieving 97% OCR accuracy below 10x and 60% at 20x, outperforming prior OCR tools with fewer vision tokens.

A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation

cs.CL · 2024-06-01 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

A systematic literature review that organizes recent work on LLMs for code generation into a taxonomy covering data curation, model advances, evaluations, ethics, environmental impact, and applications, with benchmark comparisons.

Large Language Models: A Survey

cs.CL · 2024-02-09 · accept · novelty 3.0

The paper surveys key large language models, their training methods, datasets, evaluation benchmarks, and future research directions in the field.

A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models

cs.CV · 2023-06-23 · accept · novelty 3.0

This survey organizes the architectures, training strategies, data, evaluation methods, extensions, and challenges of Multimodal Large Language Models.

A Survey of Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2023-03-31 · accept · novelty 3.0

This survey reviews the background, key techniques, and evaluation methods for large language models, emphasizing emergent abilities that appear at large scales.

citing papers explorer

Showing 27 of 27 citing papers.