Symbolic Tamarin models of standards-grounded QKD protocols reveal three control-plane vulnerabilities and confirm two countermeasures.
Formal Verification of Quantum Protocols
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We propose to analyse quantum protocols by applying formal verification techniques developed in classical computing for the analysis of communicating concurrent systems. One area of successful application of these techniques is that of classical security protocols, exemplified by Lowe's discovery and fix of a flaw in the well-known Needham-Schroeder authentication protocol. Secure quantum cryptographic protocols are also notoriously difficult to design. Quantum cryptography is therefore an interesting target for formal verification, and provides our first example; we expect the approach to be transferable to more general quantum information processing scenarios. The example we use is the quantum key distribution protocol proposed by Bennett and Brassard, commonly referred to as BB84. We present a model of the protocol in the process calculus CCS and the results of some initial analyses using the Concurrency Workbench of the New Century (CWB-NC).
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
quant-ph 1years
2026 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond the Quantum Promise: A Security Analysis of Classical Control in Quantum Key Distribution
Symbolic Tamarin models of standards-grounded QKD protocols reveal three control-plane vulnerabilities and confirm two countermeasures.