Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Formal Verification of Quantum Protocols

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/0203086 v1 pith:DYRFJHCP submitted 2002-03-18 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumprotocolsformalprotocolverificationclassicalexampletechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose to analyse quantum protocols by applying formal verification techniques developed in classical computing for the analysis of communicating concurrent systems. One area of successful application of these techniques is that of classical security protocols, exemplified by Lowe's discovery and fix of a flaw in the well-known Needham-Schroeder authentication protocol. Secure quantum cryptographic protocols are also notoriously difficult to design. Quantum cryptography is therefore an interesting target for formal verification, and provides our first example; we expect the approach to be transferable to more general quantum information processing scenarios. The example we use is the quantum key distribution protocol proposed by Bennett and Brassard, commonly referred to as BB84. We present a model of the protocol in the process calculus CCS and the results of some initial analyses using the Concurrency Workbench of the New Century (CWB-NC).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond the Quantum Promise: A Security Analysis of Classical Control in Quantum Key Distribution

    quant-ph 2026-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Symbolic Tamarin models of standards-grounded QKD protocols reveal three control-plane vulnerabilities and confirm two countermeasures.

Pith tools