Principal subspaces of classifier weights are largely preserved under moderate label inaccuracy, which explains why models still learn from noisy labels.
Complementary Classifier Induced Partial Label Learning
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In partial label learning (PLL), each training sample is associated with a set of candidate labels, among which only one is valid. The core of PLL is to disambiguate the candidate labels to get the ground-truth one. In disambiguation, the existing works usually do not fully investigate the effectiveness of the non-candidate label set (a.k.a. complementary labels), which accurately indicates a set of labels that do not belong to a sample. In this paper, we use the non-candidate labels to induce a complementary classifier, which naturally forms an adversarial relationship against the traditional PLL classifier, to eliminate the false-positive labels in the candidate label set. Besides, we assume the feature space and the label space share the same local topological structure captured by a dynamic graph, and use it to assist disambiguation. Extensive experimental results validate the superiority of the proposed approach against state-of-the-art PLL methods on 4 controlled UCI data sets and 6 real-world data sets, and reveal the usefulness of complementary learning in PLL. The code has been released in the link https://github.com/Chongjie-Si/PL-CL.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Why Can Accurate Models Be Learned from Inaccurate Annotations?
Principal subspaces of classifier weights are largely preserved under moderate label inaccuracy, which explains why models still learn from noisy labels.