Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Complementary Classifier Induced Partial Label Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.09897 v1 pith:V5PLZTXC submitted 2023-05-17 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords labelslabelcomplementarycandidateclassifierlearningdatadisambiguation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In partial label learning (PLL), each training sample is associated with a set of candidate labels, among which only one is valid. The core of PLL is to disambiguate the candidate labels to get the ground-truth one. In disambiguation, the existing works usually do not fully investigate the effectiveness of the non-candidate label set (a.k.a. complementary labels), which accurately indicates a set of labels that do not belong to a sample. In this paper, we use the non-candidate labels to induce a complementary classifier, which naturally forms an adversarial relationship against the traditional PLL classifier, to eliminate the false-positive labels in the candidate label set. Besides, we assume the feature space and the label space share the same local topological structure captured by a dynamic graph, and use it to assist disambiguation. Extensive experimental results validate the superiority of the proposed approach against state-of-the-art PLL methods on 4 controlled UCI data sets and 6 real-world data sets, and reveal the usefulness of complementary learning in PLL. The code has been released in the link https://github.com/Chongjie-Si/PL-CL.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Can Accurate Models Be Learned from Inaccurate Annotations?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Principal subspaces of classifier weights are largely preserved under moderate label inaccuracy, which explains why models still learn from noisy labels.

Pith tools