REVIEW 1 cited by
Complementary Classifier Induced Partial Label Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In partial label learning (PLL), each training sample is associated with a set of candidate labels, among which only one is valid. The core of PLL is to disambiguate the candidate labels to get the ground-truth one. In disambiguation, the existing works usually do not fully investigate the effectiveness of the non-candidate label set (a.k.a. complementary labels), which accurately indicates a set of labels that do not belong to a sample. In this paper, we use the non-candidate labels to induce a complementary classifier, which naturally forms an adversarial relationship against the traditional PLL classifier, to eliminate the false-positive labels in the candidate label set. Besides, we assume the feature space and the label space share the same local topological structure captured by a dynamic graph, and use it to assist disambiguation. Extensive experimental results validate the superiority of the proposed approach against state-of-the-art PLL methods on 4 controlled UCI data sets and 6 real-world data sets, and reveal the usefulness of complementary learning in PLL. The code has been released in the link https://github.com/Chongjie-Si/PL-CL.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Why Can Accurate Models Be Learned from Inaccurate Annotations?
Principal subspaces of classifier weights are largely preserved under moderate label inaccuracy, which explains why models still learn from noisy labels.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.