Meta-analysis of 162 studies shows reduced prosocial behavior and moral engagement with agents versus humans, but comparable trust and performance, with agents perceived as less competent and likeable.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
An AI-agent social platform generated mostly neutral content whose use in fine-tuning reduced model truthfulness comparably to human Reddit data, suggesting limited unique harm but flagging tail risks like secret leaks.
citing papers explorer
-
Psychological and behavioural responses in human-agent vs. human-human interactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis of 162 studies shows reduced prosocial behavior and moral engagement with agents versus humans, but comparable trust and performance, with agents perceived as less competent and likeable.
-
The Moltbook Files: A Harmless Slopocalypse or Humanity's Last Experiment
An AI-agent social platform generated mostly neutral content whose use in fine-tuning reduced model truthfulness comparably to human Reddit data, suggesting limited unique harm but flagging tail risks like secret leaks.