A retrospective of the ML4CFD competition shows a Gaussian-process-based entry outranking deep learning models and the OpenFOAM solver on a tailored multi-criteria score.
ML4PhySim : Machine Learning for Physical Simulations Challenge (The airfoil design)
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The use of machine learning (ML) techniques to solve complex physical problems has been considered recently as a promising approach. However, the evaluation of such learned physical models remains an important issue for industrial use. The aim of this competition is to encourage the development of new ML techniques to solve physical problems using a unified evaluation framework proposed recently, called Learning Industrial Physical Simulations (LIPS). We propose learning a task representing a well-known physical use case: the airfoil design simulation, using a dataset called AirfRANS. The global score calculated for each submitted solution is based on three main categories of criteria covering different aspects, namely: ML-related, Out-Of-Distribution, and physical compliance criteria. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first competition addressing the use of ML-based surrogate approaches to improve the trade-off computational cost/accuracy of physical simulation.The competition is hosted by the Codabench platform with online training and evaluation of all submitted solutions.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
NeurIPS 2024 ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis
A retrospective of the ML4CFD competition shows a Gaussian-process-based entry outranking deep learning models and the OpenFOAM solver on a tailored multi-criteria score.