pith. sign in

European conference on computer vision , pages=

4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

4 Pith papers citing it

years

2026 4

representative citing papers

Deep Pre-Alignment for VLMs

cs.CV · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Deep Pre-Alignment uses a small VLM perceiver instead of ViT to pre-align visual features with LLM text space, yielding 1.9-3.0 point gains on multimodal benchmarks and 32.9% less language forgetting.

Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention

cs.AI · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

In LVLMs, attention can be replaced by random Gaussian weights with little or no performance loss, indicating that current models get lost in attention rather than efficiently using visual context.

citing papers explorer

Showing 4 of 4 citing papers.

  • WikiVQABench: A Knowledge-Grounded Visual Question Answering Benchmark from Wikipedia and Wikidata cs.CV · 2026-05-20 · conditional · none · ref 126

    WikiVQABench is a human-curated collection of Wikipedia-based VQA items that require both visual evidence and external knowledge from Wikidata to answer correctly.

  • Deep Pre-Alignment for VLMs cs.CV · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · none · ref 123

    Deep Pre-Alignment uses a small VLM perceiver instead of ViT to pre-align visual features with LLM text space, yielding 1.9-3.0 point gains on multimodal benchmarks and 32.9% less language forgetting.

  • Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention cs.AI · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · none · ref 97

    In LVLMs, attention can be replaced by random Gaussian weights with little or no performance loss, indicating that current models get lost in attention rather than efficiently using visual context.

  • DIAGRAMS: A Review Framework for Reasoning-Level Attribution in Diagram QA cs.CL · 2026-04-29 · unverdicted · none · ref 13

    DIAGRAMS introduces a schema-driven annotation tool that proposes reasoning-level evidence regions for Diagram QA pairs and reports 85.39% precision and 75.30% recall against human final selections on six datasets.