Risks are best modeled in BFO as externally grounded roles, not dispositions, with a sufficient condition based on agent aversion.
Grounding Realizable Entities
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Ontological representations of qualities, dispositions, and roles have been refined over the past decade, clarifying subtle distinctions in life science research. After articulating a widely-used characterization of these entities within the context of Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), we identify gaps in this treatment and motivate the need for supplementing the BFO characterization. By way of supplement, we propose definitions for grounding relations holding between qualities and dispositions, and dispositions and roles, illustrating our proposal by representing subtle aspects of host-pathogen interactions.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
An ontological analysis of risk in Basic Formal Ontology
Risks are best modeled in BFO as externally grounded roles, not dispositions, with a sufficient condition based on agent aversion.